source file: mills2.txt Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 15:00:25 -0800 Subject: Dynamic tuning From: vincent.kenis@infoboard.be (Vincent Kenis) Hello I sent a message a few weeks ago presenting a personal hypothesis about the scales used in Baka Pygmies polyphony. In short my idea is that the intervals in the Baka scale constantly adapt to each other according to the musical context, in such a way that musically pertinent *differential notes* ("virtual bass lines") are created. I want to thank the people who took the time to write to me. BTW I was really amazed by Mr McLaren's post, one week later, describing a new composition by his friend Larry Polanski which, if I understand well, seems to put my theory in practice :-) However the main question in my message remained unanswered : Don't *all* tuning systems, at least those related to polyphonic musical traditions, actually consist of tones constantly adjusting against each other according to the musical context so that they produce musically pertinent sonic artifacts at a given moment ? Can a scale be anything else than a rough description, a *static* hence necessarily misleading approximation of a reality made of interactive, *dynamic* microtonal shifts ? I have the feeling that, more than the ET, the comparatively recent tendency to attribute a *prescriptive* and not anymore *descriptive* function to musical notation is reponsible for denying the existence of sonic artifacts such as differential notes (why write something that anyway appears without anybody playing it ?) but also for having people believe there are actually only two different basic intervals (half and whole tone) and only 12 different notes in the octaves. The concept of measure is another example of map taken for the territory. A few centuries ago orchestra conductors would count not "one, two, three, four" but "one, one, one, one" ("tactus"). Orchestras got bigger, bigger orchestras needed more obvious points of reference not to drift rythmically, so these unities became grouped by 3, 4 etc. This unequivoquial division of time leaded to the flagrant rythmic underdevelopment of western music compared to west african music for example. And so a convention adopted for practical rather than musical reasons had a durable influence on the way we understand music. No ? I would appreciate very much any comments about my simplistic views from you honorable crowd of theorists, scholars, mathematicians whose literature, I confess, often flies way above my self-taught musician's head. Vincent Kenis @< @ - Received: from eartha.mills.edu [144.91.3.20] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Sat, 23 Dec 1995 17:01 +0100 Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI) for id IAA14354; Sat, 23 Dec 1995 08:01:07 -0800 Date: Sat, 23 Dec 1995 08:01:07 -0800 Message-Id: <0099B4E0862C6A76.579E@ezh.nl> Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu