source file: mills2.txt Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 12:53:13 -0700 Subject: RE: Why I use == temperament From: PAULE Harold wrote, >And to reply to Gary Morrison--in a IV, V7, I progression, I would have the >tonic of IV descend to the 7/4 over V for the V7, and then let it resolve in >its usual manner. In 19-tet, you'd be dividing the semitone from 4^ to 3^ exactly in half. To me, this is very different from the aesthetic of conventional diatonic harmony. If V7 is acting as a dissonance, I'd prefer to use the "worse" version of 4^ to maintain the integrity of the diatonic scale. But vive la difference! P.S. I find that there is no satisfactory version of a just 4:5:6:7 chord even in 19-tet. The 7/4 is just too far from just to act as a consonance. -Paul E. Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Fri, 20 Sep 1996 21:53 +0200 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA30627; Fri, 20 Sep 1996 21:54:41 +0200 Received: from eartha.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA30969 Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI) for id MAA13421; Fri, 20 Sep 1996 12:54:40 -0700 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 12:54:40 -0700 Message-Id: <50960920195205/0005695065PK2EM@MCIMAIL.COM> Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu