source file: mills2.txt Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 07:07:51 -0800 Subject: Re: Pitch Bend Tuning From: Gary Morrison <71670.2576@CompuServe.COM> Oh, one other thing regarding the K2x00. I recall my K2500-user friend concluding that it queues up control-change messages and responds to them every so-and-so number of milliseconds. That as opposed to responding to them in order as they come in. I don't recall what he claimed that "so-and-so" number of milliseconds to be. Can anybody confirm or deny that conclusion? If indeed that is true, and if that also applies to pitch-bend messages, then it is theoretically possible for a pitch-bend message sent before a note-on to actually be serviced after the note-on, causing a "blurp" in the attack. Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 16:09 +0100 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA06923; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 16:10:44 +0100 Received: from eartha.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA06924 Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI) for id HAA24409; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 07:10:41 -0800 Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 07:10:41 -0800 Message-Id: <961107150059_71670.2576_HHB68-11@CompuServe.COM> Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu