source file: mills2.txt Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 09:48:42 -0800 Subject: 9 limit From: Daniel Wolf <106232.3266@compuserve.com> Gary Morrison wrote: '' But for whatever it's worth, I don't think that 9 would be considered a limit on the grounds that it's not prime. '' Since limit is Partch's term, let's go with his usage, and describe the limit as the highest odd number. We may always use the Euler notation to describe the set in terms of prime numbers. In Partch's harmonic style 9 does have a distinctive role independent of it prime factors. Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Fri, 3 Jan 1997 18:47 +0100 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA00562; Fri, 3 Jan 1997 18:50:14 +0100 Received: from eartha.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA00560 Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI) for id JAA27914; Fri, 3 Jan 1997 09:50:12 -0800 Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 09:50:12 -0800 Message-Id: <199701031245_MC1-E1E-339C@compuserve.com> Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu