source file: mills2.txt Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 17:42:00 -0800 Subject: Re: TUNING digest 946 From: Gary Morrison <71670.2576@compuserve.com> > Yes, 41 is simplest, but 53 system is much better. Fifts are even better, > and thirds are much better than in 41 system. That's certainly true for the traditional thirds, but 41 fits 9:7 and 7:6 better, although only slightly better. 41 is however significantly better at the 11:9 neutral third. Then again, 11:9 isn't 9-limit of course. Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 05:36 +0100 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA21367; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 05:39:39 +0100 Received: from eartha.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA21364 Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI) for id UAA26529; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 20:39:36 -0800 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 20:39:36 -0800 Message-Id: <32D0CD66.42BF@ix.netcom.com> Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu