source file: mills2.txt
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 13:42:00 -0800

Subject: RE: "wuzzat?"

From: Manuel.Op.de.Coul@ezh.nl (Manuel Op de Coul)

Gary writes
<<   By no means am I suggesting that imply that mystical ideas are
unimportant, or meaningless.  In fact, when we're on our death beds, many
of us will conclude that they are the ONLY meaningful ideas.  They're just
not of much concern to science, nor is science of much concern to
mysticism.  They contribute very little to each other.>>

Well no, mysticism can very well be the subject of scientific research.
References:
- Frits Staal: Over zin en onzin in filosofie, religie en wetenschap.
Amsterdam 1986.
- Frits Staal: Exploring Mysticism. Berkeley 1975.

He argues this on the basis of the following two recommendations:
1. Determine if everything that appears to be meaningful, is meaningful.
2. Analyse not only what is meaningful, but also what is not meaningful,
therefore everything.

Manuel Op de Coul    coul@ezh.nl

Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl
           with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 22:44 +0100
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA16723; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 22:44:39 +0100
Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA16850
Received: from  by ella.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
	 id NAA06145; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 13:42:32 -0800
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 13:42:32 -0800
Message-Id: <009B1CF40072993C.8A33@vbv40.ezh.nl>
Errors-To: madole@mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@ella.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@ella.mills.edu