source file: mills2.txt Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 14:02:01 +0200 Subject: RE: Why x-ET? From: mr88cet@texas.net (Gary Morrison) > I think it's fair to say that, with larger numbers of steps per octave, >there are fewer shades of chromaticism to choose from. Ha! I don't think that's fair to say at all! I changed my phraseology horses in the middle of the stream there. Ooops. As you presumably guessed, I meant to say "with SMALLER numbers of steps per octave, there are fewer shades of chromaticism". Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Wed, 14 May 1997 18:59 +0200 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA01902; Wed, 14 May 1997 18:59:27 +0200 Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 18:59:27 +0200 Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA01900 Received: (qmail 9428 invoked from network); 14 May 1997 16:59:15 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 May 1997 16:59:15 -0000 Message-Id: Errors-To: madole@mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu