source file: mills3.txt Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 16:02:28 +0200 Subject: Re: TUNING digest 1150 From: mr88cet@texas.net (Gary Morrison) >Could we please avoid the term *quartertone* for anything but the unit of >24-tET? As soon as you say a quartertone is the unit of 31-tET, you might >as well use the term to describe any small interval For whatever it's worth, I agree wholeheartedly. But then again, I think that the term "syntonic comma" should be reserved for 81:80! (That as opposed to it being the name for a tuning-error mechanism that can have a different value for each different tuning.) SMTPOriginator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu From: stick@dnvr.uswest.net Subject: microtones in Albuquerque PostedDate: 12-08-97 19:09:57 SendTo: CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH ReplyTo: tuning@eartha.mills.edu $UpdatedBy: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH,CN=Manuel op de Coul/OU=AT/O=EZH RouteServers: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=notesrv1/OU=Server/O=EZH RouteTimes: 12-08-97 20:16:59-12-08-97 20:17:00,12-08-97 20:15:22-12-08-97 20:15:22 DeliveredDate: 12-08-97 20:15:22 Categories: $Revisions: Received: from ns.ezh.nl by notesrv2.ezh.nl (Lotus SMTP MTA v1.1 (385.6 5-6-1997)) with SMTP id C12564F1.00646C3B; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 20:17:02 +0200 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA09050; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 19:09:57 +0200 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 19:09:57 +0200 Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA08899 Received: (qmail 13195 invoked from network); 12 Aug 1997 17:09:03 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Aug 1997 17:09:03 -0000 Message-Id: <33F0981C.66CF@dnvr.uswest.net> Errors-To: madole@mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu