source file: m1414.txt Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 18:08:12 -0400 Subject: RE: Odd vs. Prime and Lattice Diagrams From: "Paul H. Erlich" Joe Monzo wrote, >Paul Erlich, did you ever consider the fact >that the relationships between ratios which >are so elegantly portrayed in your triangular >lattice diagrams are the result of nothing other >than prime factorization? The assertion in that question makes no sense to me, but Paul Hahn generously replied, >This doesn't mean all that much--I'm still struggling with the 7-limit, >but if I were to work in 9-limit or higher, I'd probably prefer to >diagram the 9s with a separate axis, and have one of the unison vectors >be (2 0 0 -1), to reflect my odd-limit orientation. Of course this >would be much easier if I were a five-dimensional being who could buy >4-dimensional graph paper. I'd have to agree with Paul H., but wonder if there is something to Joe's question that he wasn't expressing as well as he would have liked?