source file: m1417.txt
Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 11:22:25 -0400

Subject: TUNING digest 1416

From: Rick Sanford <76122.2237@compuserve.com>

Topic No. 10

Hello:

There's no such thing as atonal serialism. 
Reading shabby translations of Sch*nberg will not help
one understand serialism. 
One must approach Babbitt and the time-point system to
have a grasp of serialism. 

>Do you make a distinction between serialism and
>atonal serialism?  Since then I've heard at
>least 10 different people speak on what they thought serialism was