source file: m1602.txt Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 17:24:14 -0500 Subject: multidimensional scaling diagrams From: "Paul H. Erlich" I wrote, >>For example, a diatonic or extended meantone scale, when scaled to three >>dimensions, comes out as a helix, with the chain of fifths winding around >>the helix so that one full turn corresponds to 3-4 fifths, putting all the >>notes of each consonant triad near to one another. The result is the >>simplest and most informative diagram of the diatonic scale or extended >>meantone tuning that I can imagine. Carl Lumma asked, >You say you've done this for various scales? Do you have any pics? Yes, and luckily they are ascii! Here is the diatonic scale, scaled down to 3 dimensions, projected onto each of the three orthogonal planes: 2 ^ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 1 ^ > a ' ' D ' i ' m ' > f > e e ' n ' s ' i 0 ^ > d o ' n ' ' 2 ' > c > b ' ' ' ' -1 ^ > g ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' -2 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ff -2 -1 0 1 2 Dimension 1 ' ' 2 ^ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' D ' > d i 1 ^ m ' e ' n ' s ' i ' o ' > g > a n ' ' 3 0 ^ ' ' > f > b ' ' ' ' > c > e ' ' -1 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ff -2 -1 0 1 2 Dimension 1 ' ' 2 ^ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' D ' > d i 1 ^ m ' e ' n ' s ' i ' o ' > g > a n ' ' 3 0 ^ ' ' > b > f ' ' ' ' > c > e ' ' -1 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ff -2 -1 0 1 2 Dimension 2 Here is a pentachordal dectonic scale (labeled with letters p-y) ' ' 2 ^ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' > y > r D ' i 1 ^ m ' e ' n ' > u > v s ' i ' o ' n ' ' 2 0 ^ ' ' ' z < > s ' ' ' > q > p ' ' -1 ^ > w > t ' Sff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ff -2 -1 0 1 2 Dimension 1 ' 2 ^ ' ' ' ' ' > s ' ' ' 1 ^ ' ' > w D ' i ' > y m ' e ' > v n ' > p s ' i 0 ^ o ' n ' > q ' > u 3 ' ' > r ' ' > t ' -1 ^ ' ' ' ' > z ' ' ' ' -2 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ff -2 -1 0 1 2 Dimension 1 ' ' 2 ^ ' ' ' ' ' ' > s ' ' ' 1 ^ ' ' ' > w D ' > y i ' m ' e ' > v n ' > p s ' i 0 ^ o ' n ' > q ' > u 3 ' ' ' > r ' > t ' ' -1 ^ ' ' ' ' > z ' ' ' ' ' -2 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffffff^ff -1 0 1 2 Dimension 2 Here is a symmetrical decatonic scale: ' ' ' ' ' ' > q 1 ^ ' > w > u ' ' D ' i ' m ' > s > y e ' n ' s ' i 0 ^ o ' n ' ' 2 ' > t > x ' ' ' ' ' > p > r -1 ^ ' > v ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' -2 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffffff^ff -1 0 1 Dimension 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' 1 ^ > s > y ' ' > v ' D ' i ' m ' e ' n ' s ' i 0 ^w 2 p u 2 r o ' n ' ' 3 ' ' ' ' ' > q ' -1 ^ > t > x ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' -2 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffffff^ff -1 0 1 Dimension 1 2 ^ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 1 ^ s 2 y ' ' > v D ' i ' m ' e ' n ' s ' i 0 ^ r 2 p w 2 u o ' n ' ' 3 ' ' ' ' > q ' -1 ^ x 2 t ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' -2 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ff -2 -1 0 1 2 Dimension 2 And here is 12-tone equal temperament: 2 ^ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' > c ' > f > g 1 ^ ' ' D ' > d i ' > a# m ' e ' n ' s ' > d# i 0 ^ o ' > a n ' ' 2 ' ' > e ' > g# ' ' -1 ^ ' > c# > b ' > f# ' ' ' ' ' ' -2 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ff -2 -1 0 1 2 Dimension 1 ' ' 1 ^ ' ' D ' > a# > f# > d i ' c# < > f > a m ' e ' n ' s ' i 0 ^ o ' n ' ' 3 ' ' > d# b < > g ' > g# > c > e ' ' -1 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ff -2 -1 0 1 2 Dimension 1 ' ' 1 ^ ' ' D ' > f# a# < > d i ' > c# > a > f m ' e ' n ' s ' i 0 ^ o ' n ' ' 3 ' ' > b > d# > g ' g# < > e > c ' ' -1 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ff -2 -1 0 1 2 Dimension 2 Better results for 12-tET come from only scaling down to 4 dimensions, although the result cannot really be visualized: ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' > b > e 1 ^ ' > f# ' > a D ' i ' m ' > c# e ' n ' > d s ' i 0 ^ o ' n ' > g# ' 2 ' > g ' ' ' > d# ' > c -1 ^ ' > a# > f ' ' ' ' ' ' ' -2 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ff -2 -1 0 1 2 Dimension 1 ' ' 1 ^ ' ' > c# > f > a D ' i ' m ' e ' n ' > f# > a# > d s ' i 0 ^ o ' n ' > g# > e > c ' 3 ' ' ' ' > d# > b > g ' -1 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ff -2 -1 0 1 2 Dimension 1 ' ' 1 ^ ' ' > f# > a# > d D ' i ' m ' e ' n ' > d# > b > g s ' i 0 ^ o ' n ' > c# > f > a ' 4 ' ' ' ' > g# > e > c ' -1 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ff -2 -1 0 1 2 Dimension 1 ' ' 1 ^ ' ' > f > c# > a D ' i ' m ' e ' n ' > a# > d > f# s ' i 0 ^ o ' n ' > c > g# > e ' 3 ' ' ' ' > d# > g > b ' -1 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ff -2 -1 0 1 2 Dimension 2 ' ' 1 ^ ' ' > a# > d > f# D ' i ' m ' e ' n ' > d# > g > b s ' i 0 ^ o ' n ' > f > c# > a ' 4 ' ' ' ' > c > g# > e ' -1 ^ ' Sff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffff^ff -2 -1 0 1 2 Dimension 2 ' ' 1 ^ ' ' ' ' f# ' d 3 a# ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' g D ' d# 3 b i ' m ' e ' n ' s ' i 0 ^ o ' n ' ' 4 ' ' f ' c# 3 a ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' g# ' e 3 c ' ' ' ' -1 ^ ' S^fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff^ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff f^f -1 0 1 Dimension 3 The input distance matrices were based on the log of the odd limit of the most likely interpretation but included a correction term to account for the inaccuracy of 12- or 22-tET; I don't remember how I did it but it made sense to me at the time.