source file: mills2.txt Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 22:27:36 -0800 Subject: Re: TUNING digest 559 From: Gary Morrison <71670.2576@compuserve.com> > The 12 tone equal temperament scale is derived from the overtone > series of a vibrating string. Of course most of us tuning listers will be prompt to point out that 12TET doesn't provide a *really great* harmonic series approximation. The 5th harmonic is way sharp and it misses some really neat harmonics - 7, 11, and 13 for example. It does, however, provide a fairly EFFICIENT mapping to the harmonics it does match - matching the first 5 harmonics reasonably well on as a coarse resolution as 100 cents, is in my view an impressive feat. Buuuut, that's not the central focus of your question. In response to your question, I suppose it's worth pointing out that Brian is speaking about a classification of tunings that ... well, I was starting to say "intentionally avoid" harmonic relationships, but I suspect it would be more appropriate to say, "make no effort to match" harmonic relationships. I'm still catching up on Brian's NJNET posts, so I'm not certain of the context behind his allusion to different vibrational modes. Buuuut, everything I've read of those posts so far suggest that they are based upon abstract mathematical formulations (other than those of JI and ET), and not upon "found" pitch relationships, by which I mean pitch relationships found in natural vibrational systems. That is unless of course he's found a NJNET mathematical formulation for the vibrational modes of spheres or whatever. I kind of doubt if those vibrational modes are predictable by formulations like the inharmonic series formulations he's mentioned (such logs of factorials). So I kinda doubt if vibrational modes of physical structures other than strings is his main point really. Unfortunately, since I haven't gotten that far yet, I'm not much good for commenting on what he was speaking of there. Received: from eartha.mills.edu [144.91.3.20] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Thu, 16 Nov 1995 08:30 +0100 Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI) for id WAA25062; Wed, 15 Nov 1995 22:30:00 -0800 Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 22:30:00 -0800 Message-Id: <951116062526_71670.2576_HHB31-4@CompuServe.COM> Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu