source file: mills2.txt Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 14:18:32 -0700 Subject: Pitch Bend for Tuning From: Lindsay Shaw and Paul Turner A process such as Manuel Op de Coul suggests seems feasible, but surely it is easier to simply retune the standard twelve pitches available in whichever channel(s) one needs to use, by means of sysex messages, for example. Can anyone explain why this should be less easy than retuning by pitch bend? The only situation that springs to my mind where pitch bend would be the method of choice, is when the tuning system is irregular and changes from moment to moment. Paul Turner Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Tue, 15 Oct 1996 23:39 +0200 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA19789; Tue, 15 Oct 1996 23:40:49 +0200 Received: from eartha.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA06308 Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI) for id OAA06903; Tue, 15 Oct 1996 14:40:46 -0700 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 14:40:46 -0700 Message-Id: Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu