First Previous Next Last 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
![]() ![]() |
9532 What the numbers mean * | Paul Erlich | Fri, 30 Jan 2004 21:52:42 |
![]() ![]() |
9535 114 7-limit temperaments * | Paul Erlich | Fri, 30 Jan 2004 21:57:45 |
![]() ![]() |
9537 Attn: Gene 2 * | Paul Erlich | Fri, 30 Jan 2004 21:59:35 |
![]() ![]() |
9541 Graef article on rationalization of scales * | Paul Erlich | Fri, 30 Jan 2004 21:44:17 |
![]() ![]() |
9542 TOP BP = BP * | Paul Erlich | Fri, 30 Jan 2004 22:22:43 |
![]() ![]() |
9545 60 for Dave (was: 41 "Hermanic" 7-limit linear temperaments) * | Paul Erlich | Fri, 30 Jan 2004 22:49:40 |
![]() ![]() |
9548 114 7-limit temperaments * | Paul Erlich | Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:13:03 |
![]() ![]() |
9549 60 for Dave (was: 41 "Hermanic" 7-limit linear temperaments) * | Paul Erlich | Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:24:28 |
![]() ![]() |
9554 114 7-limit temperaments * | Paul Erlich | Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:41:50 |
![]() ![]() |
9558 60 for Dave * | Paul Erlich | Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:49:07 |
![]() ![]() |
9563 114 7-limit temperaments * | Paul Erlich | Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:59:08 |
![]() ![]() |
9572 60 for Dave * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:42:53 |
![]() ![]() |
9573 the choice of wedgie-norm greatly impacts miracle's ranking * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:12:28 |
![]() ![]() |
9574 I guess Pajara's not #2 * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 19:45:09 |
![]() ![]() |
9575 What the numbers mean * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:28:05 |
![]() ![]() |
9576 Cross-check for TOP 5-limit 12-equal * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 20:21:32 |
![]() ![]() |
9577 Crunch algorithm * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:49:24 |
![]() ![]() |
9580 Crunch algorithm * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:52:29 |
![]() ![]() |
9583 60 for Dave * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 01:04:58 |
![]() ![]() |
9584 kleismic v. hanson (was Re: 60 for Dave) * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:44:36 |
![]() ![]() |
9587 kleismic v. hanson (was Re: 60 for Dave) * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:01:36 |
![]() ![]() |
9589 hey gene . . . * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:03:21 |
![]() ![]() |
9591 So MIRACLE is really #3, Pajara #2 in log-flat? * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:10:16 |
![]() ![]() |
9593 the choice of wedgie-norm greatly impacts miracle's ranking * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:12:40 |
![]() ![]() |
9594 the choice of wedgie-norm greatly impacts miracle's ranking * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:33:46 |
![]() ![]() |
9595 I guess Pajara's not #2 * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:52:27 |
![]() ![]() |
9596 60 for Dave * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 06:43:35 |
![]() ![]() |
9597 The true top 32 in log-flat? * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 19:23:07 |
![]() ![]() |
9598 pelogic and kleismic/hanson * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 06:54:13 |
![]() ![]() |
9600 Nonoctave scales in your livingroom * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 06:56:00 |
![]() ![]() |
9602 60 for Dave * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 07:17:27 |
![]() ![]() |
9603 Crunch algorithm * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 07:23:19 |
![]() ![]() |
9604 114 7-limit temperaments * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:11:40 |
![]() ![]() |
9605 60 for Dave (was: 41 "Hermanic" 7-limit linear temperaments) * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:59:44 |
![]() ![]() |
9606 114 7-limit temperaments * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:19:24 |
![]() ![]() |
9609 the choice of wedgie-norm greatly impacts miracle's ranking * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:42:58 |
![]() ![]() |
9610 pelogic and kleismic/hanson * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:37:28 |
![]() ![]() |
9611 kleismic v. hanson (was Re: 60 for Dave) * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:46:10 |
![]() ![]() |
9623 60 for Dave (was: 41 "Hermanic" 7-limit linear temperaments) * | Paul Erlich | Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:47:52 |
![]() ![]() |
9627 I guess Pajara's not #2 * | Paul Erlich | Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:52:23 |
![]() ![]() |
9630 60 for Dave (was: 41 "Hermanic" 7-limit linear temperaments) * | Paul Erlich | Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:55:01 |
![]() ![]() |
9641 Back to the 5-limit cutoff (was: 60 for Dave) * | Paul Erlich | Sun, 01 Feb 2004 03:38:46 |
![]() ![]() |
9644 The true top 32 in log-flat? * | Paul Erlich | Sun, 01 Feb 2004 04:40:50 |
![]() ![]() |
9645 Back to the 5-limit cutoff (was: 60 for Dave) * | Paul Erlich | Sun, 01 Feb 2004 04:44:43 |
![]() ![]() |
9646 The true top 32 in log-flat? * | Paul Erlich | Sun, 01 Feb 2004 04:50:04 |
![]() ![]() |
9652 The true top 32 in log-flat? * | Paul Erlich | Sun, 01 Feb 2004 05:57:51 |
![]() ![]() |
9654 Back to the 5-limit cutoff (was: 60 for Dave) * | Paul Erlich | Sun, 01 Feb 2004 05:59:56 |
![]() ![]() |
9656 7-limit horagrams * | Paul Erlich | Sun, 01 Feb 2004 06:12:31 |
![]() ![]() |
9661 The true top 32 in log-flat? * | Paul Erlich | Sun, 01 Feb 2004 06:16:34 |
![]() ![]() |
9663 7-limit horagrams * | Paul Erlich | Sun, 01 Feb 2004 06:23:23 |