First Previous Next Last 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
![]() ![]() |
4768 72 owns the 11-limit * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 06 Oct 2001 07:20:32 |
![]() ![]() |
4769 72 owns the 11-limit * | genewardsmith@xxxx.xxx | Sat, 06 Oct 2001 18:40:08 |
![]() ![]() |
4775 72 owns the 11-limit * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 06 Oct 2001 21:14:41 |
![]() ![]() |
4777 72 owns the 11-limit * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 06 Oct 2001 21:46:10 |
![]() ![]() |
4974 8 note block from my example * | genewardsmith@xxxx.xxx | Wed, 14 Nov 2001 04:11:17 |
![]() ![]() |
4235 [cm] X.J. Scott and Jacky Ligon get Froggy... * | monz | Thu, 9 Aug 2001 09:52:24 |
![]() ![]() |
4002 [tuning] questions about Graham's matrices (was: 13-limit mappings) * | monz | Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:03:40 |
![]() ![]() |
4000 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | monz | Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:38:34 |
![]() ![]() |
4001 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | monz | Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:59:52 |
![]() ![]() |
6149 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | monz | Fri, 11 Jan 2002 14:04:16 |
![]() ![]() |
6157 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | monz | Fri, 11 Jan 2002 01:13:43 |
![]() ![]() |
6227 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | paulerlich | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 21:42:53 |
![]() ![]() |
6228 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | monz | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 23:10:41 |
![]() ![]() |
6231 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | monz | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 20:55:15 |
![]() ![]() |
6232 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | paulerlich | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 21:47:47 |
![]() ![]() |
6238 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | paulerlich | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 21:53:04 |
![]() ![]() |
6250 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | monz | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:57:39 |
![]() ![]() |
6252 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | paulerlich | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 23:00:03 |
![]() ![]() |
6255 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | monz | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:36:31 |
![]() ![]() |
6259 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | paulerlich | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 23:42:40 |
![]() ![]() |
6264 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | monz | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:18:24 |
![]() ![]() |
6266 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | monz | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:26:34 |
![]() ![]() |
6269 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | monz | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 13:27:14 |
![]() ![]() |
6277 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | monz | Wed, 16 Jan 2002 03:26:43 |
![]() ![]() |
6301 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | paulerlich | Wed, 16 Jan 2002 01:09:28 |
![]() ![]() |
6314 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | monz | Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:45:12 |
![]() ![]() |
6332 [tuning] Re: badly tuned remote overtones * | paulerlich | Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:00:19 |
![]() ![]() |
4106 [tuning] Re: fractional exponents of prime-factors * | monz | Fri, 20 Jul 2001 22:59:42 |
![]() ![]() |
4111 [tuning] Re: fractional exponents of prime-factors * | monz | Fri, 20 Jul 2001 07:58:19 |
![]() ![]() |
4113 [tuning] Re: fractional exponents of prime-factors * | Paul Erlich | Sat, 21 Jul 2001 03:42:31 |
![]() ![]() |
5597 [tuning] Re: great explanation [periodicity block] * | paulerlich | Thu, 20 Dec 2001 04:44:35 |
![]() ![]() |
5600 [tuning] Re: great explanation [periodicity block] * | paulerlich | Thu, 20 Dec 2001 04:50:28 |
![]() ![]() |
6037 A 72-et decatonic * | paulerlich | Mon, 07 Jan 2002 06:42:11 |
![]() ![]() |
6055 A 72-et decatonic * | paulerlich | Mon, 07 Jan 2002 07:11:27 |
![]() ![]() |
6067 A 72-et decatonic * | paulerlich | Mon, 07 Jan 2002 07:38:29 |
![]() ![]() |
4602 a class of non-octave scales * | genewardsmith@xxxx.xxx | Wed, 19 Sep 2001 18:54:18 |
![]() ![]() |
6384 A comparison of Partch's scale in RI and Hemiennealimmal * | dkeenanuqnetau | Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:14:11 |
![]() ![]() |
4352 A counterexample to the hypothesis? * | graham@xxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx | Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:56 +0 |
![]() ![]() |
4355 A counterexample to the hypothesis? * | genewardsmith@xxxx.xxx | Wed, 22 Aug 2001 23:59:26 |
![]() ![]() |
4365 A counterexample to the hypothesis? * | genewardsmith@xxxx.xxx | Wed, 22 Aug 2001 07:16:40 |
![]() ![]() |
4371 A counterexample to the hypothesis? * | Paul Erlich | Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:41:01 |
![]() ![]() |
4396 A counterexample to the hypothesis? * | Dave Keenan | Thu, 23 Aug 2001 01:55:36 |
![]() ![]() |
4398 A counterexample to the hypothesis? * | Dave Keenan | Thu, 23 Aug 2001 02:47:43 |
![]() ![]() |
5640 a different example (was: coordinates from unison-vectors) * | monz | Sun, 23 Dec 2001 15:31:23 |
![]() ![]() |
5642 a different example (was: coordinates from unison-vectors) * | monz | Sun, 23 Dec 2001 15:47:12 |
![]() ![]() |
5645 a different example (was: coordinates from unison-vectors) * | paulerlich | Sun, 23 Dec 2001 23:47:47 |
![]() ![]() |
5689 a different example (was: coordinates from unison-vectors) * | paulerlich | Mon, 24 Dec 2001 04:33:41 |
![]() ![]() |
5646 a different example * | monz | Sun, 23 Dec 2001 15:55:26 |
![]() ![]() |
5650 a different example * | paulerlich | Sun, 23 Dec 2001 23:57:24 |
![]() ![]() |
5681 a different example * | dkeenanuqnetau | Mon, 24 Dec 2001 00:47:50 |
First Previous Next Last 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41