This is an Opt In Archive . We would like to hear from you if you want your posts included. For the contact address see About this archive. All posts are copyright (c).
Contents Hide Contents S 1110000 10050 10100 10150 10200 10250 10300 10350 10400 10450 10500 10550 10600 10650 10700 10750 10800 10850 10900 10950
10300 - 10325 -
Message: 10300 Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 21:23:56 Subject: Re: A modest proposal From: Paul Erlich --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote: > What about using Herman's phenomenon as a high-error cutoff? Works for linears -- but for other kinds of temperament?
Message: 10302 Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 21:41:16 Subject: Re: A symmetric-based 7-limit temperament list From: Paul Erlich Injera involves two long chains of fifths, and fifths are just as long as any other consonance in the symmetric lattice Gene used here. In a 5-limit version of this list, 2187;2048 would surely score quite poorly because of the long chain of fifths it involves. --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx Herman Miller <hmiller@I...> wrote: > This ordering seems to be good at keeping similar/related temperaments > together. It's missing pelogic, injera, and dicot, though. I can > understand why pelogic and dicot might be missing, but injera [2, 8, 8, > 8, 7, -4] is a good enough temperament that it should have made the list. > > Gene Ward Smith wrote: > > > 11: [1, -1, 3, -4, 2, 10] [[1, 2, 2, 4], [0, -1, 1, -3]] > > rms: 43.659491 symcom: 35.000000 symbad: 1528.082200 > > Number 13 Father > TOP tuning [1185.869125, 1924.351908, 2819.124589, 3401.317477] > > > 12: [2, -2, -2, -8, -9, 1] [[2, 3, 5, 6], [0, 1, -1, -1]] > > rms: 43.142169 symcom: 44.000000 symbad: 1898.255432 > > Number 62 > TOP tuning [1185.468457, 1924.986952, 2816.886876, 3409.621105] > Audibly very similar to Number 13, and has a simpler mapping. > > > 13: [2, -2, 1, -8, -4, 8] [[1, 2, 2, 3], [0, -2, 2, -1]] > > rms: 41.524693 symcom: 35.000000 symbad: 1453.364254 > > Number 57 > TOP tuning [1185.869125, 1924.351909, 2819.124589, 3333.914203] > Another member of the father temperament family, but the 7:1 > approximation is worse than Number 13, and the 7:4 is unrecognizable. > > > 14: [2, 3, 1, 0, -4, -6] [[1, 2, 3, 3], [0, -2, -3, -1]] > > rms: 34.566097 symcom: 20.000000 symbad: 691.321943 > > Number 4 Beep > TOP tuning [1194.642673, 1879.486406, 2819.229610, 3329.028548] > > > 15: [4, 2, 2, -6, -8, -1] [[2, 4, 5, 6], [0, -2, -1, -1]] > > rms: 23.945252 symcom: 32.000000 symbad: 766.248055 > > Number 32 Decimal > TOP tuning [1207.657798, 1914.092323, 2768.532858, 3372.361757] > > > 16: [1, 4, -2, 4, -6, -16] [[1, 2, 4, 2], [0, -1, -4, 2]] > > rms: 20.163282 symcom: 75.000000 symbad: 1512.246136 > > Number 7 Dominant Seventh > TOP tuning [1195.228951, 1894.576888, 2797.391744, 3382.219933] > > > 17: [4, 4, 4, -3, -5, -2] [[4, 6, 9, 11], [0, 1, 1, 1]] > > rms: 19.136993 symcom: 48.000000 symbad: 918.575644 > > Number 17 Diminished > TOP tuning [1194.128460, 1892.648830, 2788.245174, 3385.309404] > > > 18: [6, 0, 0, -14, -17, 0] [[6, 10, 14, 17], [0, -1, 0, 0]] > > rms: 18.042924 symcom: 108.000000 symbad: 1948.635783 > > Number 85 > TOP tuning [1194.473353, 1901.955001, 2787.104490, 3384.341166] > Would make a good 12-note keyboard mapping. There aren't many > temperaments based on 1/6-octave periods; this is the first one I've seen. > > > 19: [6, 0, 3, -14, -12, 7] [[3, 4, 7, 8], [0, 2, 0, 1]] > > rms: 16.786584 symcom: 99.000000 symbad: 1661.871769 > > Number 75 > TOP tuning [1199.400031, 1910.341746, 2798.600074, 3353.970936] > No simpler than Augmented, but sounds a bit more warped. > > > 20: [3, 0, 6, -7, 1, 14] [[3, 5, 7, 9], [0, -1, 0, -2]] > > rms: 16.598678 symcom: 99.000000 symbad: 1643.269152 > > Number 5 Augmented > TOP tuning [1199.976630, 1892.649878, 2799.945472, 3385.307546] > > > 21: [0, 5, 0, 8, 0, -14] [[5, 8, 12, 14], [0, 0, -1, 0]] > > rms: 15.815352 symcom: 75.000000 symbad: 1186.151431 > > Number 14 Blackwood > TOP tuning [1195.893464, 1913.429542, 2786.313713, 3348.501698] > > > 22: [2, 8, 1, 8, -4, -20] [[1, 2, 4, 3], [0, -2, -8, -1]] > > rms: 12.690078 symcom: 155.000000 symbad: 1966.962143 > > Number 24 Hemifourths > TOP tuning [1203.668842, 1902.376967, 2794.832500, 3358.526166] > > > 23: [6, 5, 3, -6, -12, -7] [[1, 0, 1, 2], [0, 6, 5, 3]] > > rms: 12.273810 symcom: 84.000000 symbad: 1031.000003 > > Number 27 Kleismic > TOP tuning [1203.187308, 1907.006766, 2792.359613, 3359.878000] > > > 24: [4, -3, 2, -14, -8, 13] [[1, 2, 2, 3], [0, -4, 3, -2]] > > rms: 12.188571 symcom: 107.000000 symbad: 1304.177049 > > Number 28 Negri > TOP tuning [1203.187308, 1907.006766, 2780.900506, 3359.878000] > > > 25: [2, -4, -4, -11, -12, 2] [[2, 3, 5, 6], [0, 1, -2, -2]] > > rms: 10.903177 symcom: 108.000000 symbad: 1177.543168 > > Number 6 Pajara > TOP tuning [1196.893422, 1901.906680, 2779.100462, 3377.547174] > > > 26: [8, 6, 6, -9, -13, -3] [[2, 5, 6, 7], [0, -4, -3, -3]] > > rms: 10.132266 symcom: 144.000000 symbad: 1459.046340 > > Number 92 > TOP tuning [1198.553882, 1907.135354, 2778.724633, 3378.001574] > Seems to be an alternate 22-ET-type temperament, not as good as Pajara. > > > 27: [3, 0, -6, -7, -18, -14] [[3, 5, 7, 8], [0, -1, 0, 2]] > > rms: 8.100679 symcom: 171.000000 symbad: 1385.216092 > > Number 31 Tripletone > TOP tuning [1197.060039, 1902.640406, 2793.140092, 3377.079420] > > > 28: [3, 5, -6, 1, -18, -28] [[1, 2, 3, 2], [0, -3, -5, 6]] > > rms: 6.808962 symcom: 276.000000 symbad: 1879.273474 > > Number 42 Porcupine > TOP tuning [1196.905961, 1906.858938, 2779.129576, 3367.717888] > > > 29: [1, 9, -2, 12, -6, -30] [[1, 2, 6, 2], [0, -1, -9, 2]] > > rms: 6.410458 symcom: 280.000000 symbad: 1794.928214 > > Number 34 Superpythagorean > TOP tuning [1197.596121, 1905.765059, 2780.732078, 3374.046608] > > > 30: [2, -9, -4, -19, -12, 16] [[1, 1, 5, 4], [0, 2, -9, -4]] > > rms: 6.245316 symcom: 283.000000 symbad: 1767.424344 > > Number 79 Beatles > TOP tuning [1197.104145, 1906.544822, 2793.037680, 3369.535226] > > > 31: [7, 9, 13, -2, 1, 5] [[1, -1, -1, -2], [0, 7, 9, 13]] > > rms: 5.052932 symcom: 355.000000 symbad: 1793.790776 > > Number 15 Semisixths > TOP tuning [1198.389531, 1903.732520, 2790.053107, 3364.304748] > > > 32: [5, 1, 12, -10, 5, 25] [[1, 0, 2, -1], [0, 5, 1, 12]] > > rms: 4.139051 symcom: 356.000000 symbad: 1473.502082 > > Number 3 Magic > TOP tuning [1201.276744, 1903.978592, 2783.349206, 3368.271877] > > > 33: [14, 11, 9, -15, -25, -10] [[1, 5, 5, 5], [0, -14, -11, -9]] > > rms: 4.006991 symcom: 436.000000 symbad: 1747.048215 > > Not in the 114 list. Seems overly complex to be of much use. > > > 34: [1, 4, 10, 4, 13, 12] [[1, 2, 4, 7], [0, -1, -4, -10]] > > rms: 3.665035 symcom: 243.000000 symbad: 890.603432 > > Almost goes without saying, but.... > Number 2 Meantone > TOP tuning [1201.698521, 1899.262909, 2790.257556, 3370.548328] > > > 35: [3, 12, -1, 12, -10, -36] [[1, 1, 0, 3], [0, 3, 12, -1]] > > rms: 3.579262 symcom: 420.000000 symbad: 1503.290125 > > Number 35 Supermajor seconds > TOP tuning [1201.698521, 1899.262909, 2790.257556, 3372.574099] > > > 36: [4, 16, 9, 16, 3, -24] [[1, 3, 8, 6], [0, -4, -16, -9]] > > rms: 3.443812 symcom: 571.000000 symbad: 1966.416662 > > Number 84 Squares > TOP tuning [1201.698521, 1899.262909, 2790.257556, 3372.067656] > Sounds practically identical to Number 35, but with a more complex mapping. > > > 37: [10, 9, 7, -9, -17, -9] [[1, -1, 0, 1], [0, 10, 9, 7]] > > rms: 3.320167 symcom: 244.000000 symbad: 810.120816 > > Number 29 Nonkleismic > TOP tuning [1198.828458, 1900.098151, 2789.033948, 3368.077085] > > > 38: [9, 5, -3, -13, -30, -21] [[1, 1, 2, 3], [0, 9, 5, -3]] > > rms: 3.065962 symcom: 339.000000 symbad: 1039.361092 > > Number 30 Quartaminorthirds > TOP tuning [1199.792743, 1900.291122, 2788.751252, 3365.878770] > > > 39: [1, -8, -14, -15, -25, -10] [[1, 2, -1, -3], [0, -1, 8, 14]] > > rms: 2.859338 symcom: 603.000000 symbad: 1724.180520 > > Number 8 Schismic > TOP tuning [1200.760625, 1903.401919, 2784.194017, 3371.388750] > > > 40: [7, -3, 8, -21, -7, 27] [[1, 0, 3, 1], [0, 7, -3, 8]] > > rms: 2.589237 symcom: 344.000000 symbad: 890.697699 > > Number 10 Orwell > TOP tuning [1199.532657, 1900.455530, 2784.117029, 3371.481834] > > > 41: [17, 6, 15, -30, -24, 18] [[1, -5, 0, -3], [0, 17, 6, 15]] > > rms: 2.469727 symcom: 756.000000 symbad: 1867.113518 > > Now we're starting to get into temperaments that are mostly too complex > to be of much interest. This is Number 66 from the big list, and doesn't > seem to be enough better than Orwell to justify its complexity. I'll > skip most of the rest. > > > 45: [6, -7, -2, -25, -20, 15] [[1, 1, 3, 3], [0, 6, -7, -2]] > > rms: 1.637405 symcom: 347.000000 symbad: 568.179603 > > Number 9 Miracle > TOP tuning [1200.631014, 1900.954868, 2784.848544, 3368.451756] > TOP generators [1200.631014, 116.7206423] > bad: 29.119472 comp: 6.793166 err: .631014 > > > 49: [16, 2, 5, -34, -37, 6] [[1, -1, 2, 2], [0, 16, 2, 5]] > > rms: .875363 symcom: 611.000000 symbad: 534.846775 > > Number 11 Hemiwuerschmidt > TOP tuning [1199.692003, 1901.466838, 2787.028860, 3368.496143] > > > 76: [18, 27, 18, 1, -22, -34] [[9, 15, 22, 26], [0, -2, -3, -2]] > > rms: .130449 symcom: 1539.000000 symbad: 200.760896 > > Number 1 Ennealimmal > TOP tuning [1200.036377, 1902.012656, 2786.350297, 3368.723784]
Message: 10303 Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:00:25 Subject: Re: The same page From: Paul Erlich --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx Carl Lumma <ekin@l...> wrote: > >> >Erlich magic L1 norm; if > >> > > >> > <<a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6|| > >> > > >> >is the wedgie, then complexity is > >> > > >> > |a1/p3|+|a2/p5|+|a3/p7|+|a4/p3p5|+|a5/p3p7|+|a6/p5p7| > >> > >> Where wedgie is val-wedgie. But apparently there's a monzo- wedgie > >> formualation... > > > >Simply reverse the order of the entries. > > Not sure what you're saying. > > monzo-wedgie = reverse(val-wedgie) Up to some of the signs, yes. Since the above expression for complexity takes the absolute values anyway, you don't have to worry about the signs. The point is that the complexity you end up calculating is the same. We could write If ||a6 a5 a4 a3 a2 a1>> is the monzo-wedgie, then the complexity is |a1/p3|+|a2/p5|+|a3/p7|+|a4/p3p5|+|a5/p3p7|+|a6/p5p7| and we'd be getting the same answer as above.
Message: 10305 Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:15:22 Subject: Re: The same page From: Dave Keenan --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx Carl Lumma <ekin@l...> wrote: > How am I ever going to find these posts of Dave's to get to > > | a b c > ~= | -b c a > > > or whatever? Try: Yahoo groups: /tuning-math/message/7852 *
Message: 10306 Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:18:08 Subject: Re: The same page From: Paul Erlich --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Dave Keenan" <d.keenan@b...> wrote: > --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx Carl Lumma <ekin@l...> wrote: > > How am I ever going to find these posts of Dave's to get to > > > > | a b c > ~= | -b c a > > > > > or whatever? > > Try: > Yahoo groups: /tuning-math/message/7852 * Thanks Dave, for looking in even after you've gone away!
Message: 10307 Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:21:21 Subject: Re: Still another From: Dave Keenan --- In tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote: > I don't believe in Dave's > quantization of agony theory, That's "quantification", not "quantization". These are very different things.
Message: 10322 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:06:00 Subject: Re: rank complexity explanation updated From: Carl Lumma Welcome back, Manuel. >Carl wrote on 29-1: >>This happened because I wanted to give the interval matrix in >>'steps of 12-tET' units. Unfortunately (and one of my biggest >>desired features) Scala does not offer 'degrees of n-ET' units. > >Fortunately it does, use >set attribute et_step <steps/oct> > >To see the intervals in terms of these units, do >show/attribute intervals These don't look like units to me, but some secondary abstraction. Can I author a scl file using them? Does Scala display all its output in them? No, it still displays cents, with these in a separate column. -Carl
Message: 10323 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 12:00:04 Subject: Re: rank complexity explanation updated From: Manuel Op de Coul Carl wrote on 29-1: >This happened because I wanted to give the interval matrix in >'steps of 12-tET' units. Unfortunately (and one of my biggest >desired features) Scala does not offer 'degrees of n-ET' units. Fortunately it does, use set attribute et_step <steps/oct> To see the intervals in terms of these units, do show/attribute intervals Manuel ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: Yahoo groups: /tuning-math/ * <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: tuning-math-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: Yahoo! Terms of Service *
Message: 10324 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:26:54 Subject: Re: rank complexity explanation updated From: Manuel Op de Coul Carl wrote: >These don't look like units to me, but some secondary abstraction. Ah, if you mean you expected non-integer numbers, that's also possible. Then the command is: set attribute <steps/oct> For example: set attribute 12.0 >Does Scala display all its output in them? No, that's not possible. Note that you can use the input command to enter a scale in any logarithmic unit if you convert it afterwards with mult/abs 2/1, assuming 2/1 is the period you want. >No, it still displays cents, with these in a >separate column. It gave me an idea for an enhancement though, showing the attributes for the intervals of the interval matrix. I'll put that in the next version under the command show/attribute/line intervals. Manuel
10000 10050 10100 10150 10200 10250 10300 10350 10400 10450 10500 10550 10600 10650 10700 10750 10800 10850 10900 10950
10300 - 10325 -