This is part of a general question - there are many constants which have particular and rather strange values. They don’t seem random, nor are they the simplest possible values but rather very complex apparently arbitrary numbers that just happen to make our universe one that can support life. So far nobody has found a way to derive these numbers from first principles. Some of them depend on other numbers but in the end you end up with a bunch of numbers that nobody can explain yet, just have to say “That’s how it is”.

That’s the idea of the Fine-tuned Universe. One theory is that actually there are regions of our universe or other universes with many of the possible laws of physics, but most of them are uninhabitable e.g. don’t have molecules, don’t have stars, the stars are very short lived, the entire universe only lasts for a few seconds and is gone soon after the Big Bang etc - there are numerous ways our universe could be uninhabitable for beings like ourselves. Also there were times in the past when our universe was uninhabitable (soon after the Big Bang for instance) at least for beings like us. Maybe there will be times in the future that it is also, billions of years into the future.

So the idea is that we see one that is habitable because only the ones with laws of physics like this have living beings in them to observe them, and we see it at a time when it is habitable for the same reason. That’s the weak version of the anthropic principle, which is a controversial but respected idea in cosmology, with many variations on it, but it can’t be proved.

The strong anthropic principle is similar but does away with the idea of numerous other universes - but instead that something or other sets up our universe to be habitable. Lots of ideas about how that could happen. Anthropic principle - Wikipedia

They are interesting ideas but there is no way to prove or disprove them at present.