Just to add a resource for testing it out, the wikilooper does it automatically for you.
But - I think better to enter the word in the url bar as http://www.wikiloopr.com/test instead of using the form on the page itself - when I enter a word in the form, then I sometimes get two loops going on at once, with the words getting mixed up some from one loop, one from the other.
It's a bit slow but automatic so you can go away and come back and see what it's found.
Then, found a nice graph here, though it is out of date now of course, still gives a rough idea of what it's like:
do all first links on wikipedia lead to philosophy?
But - I think better to enter the word in the url bar as http://www.wikiloopr.com/test instead of using the form on the page itself - when I enter a word in the form, then I sometimes get two loops going on at once, with the words getting mixed up some from one loop, one from the other.
It's a bit slow but automatic so you can go away and come back and see what it's found.
Then, found a nice graph here, though it is out of date now of course, still gives a rough idea of what it's like:
About the Author
Robert Walker
Writer of articles on Mars and Space issues - Software Developer of Tune Smithy, Bounce Metronome etc.Studied at Wolfson College, Oxford
Lives in Isle of Mull
4.8m answer views110.4k this month
Top Writer2017, 2016, and 2015
Published WriterHuffPost, Slate, and 4 moreHuffPost, Slate, Forbes, Newsweek, Business Insider, and Science 2.0