They have. Well - 0.5 isn't both on and off. It's just 0.5. But if it's an ordinary mechanical computer you can't expect the quantum superposition of states of an analogue computer.
This is a somewhat forgotten episode of computing.
If you used the word "computer" in 1950, this is what they would think you are talking about. It's not a programmed Babbage type mechanical computer - rather - is an analogue machine, doesn't use numbers internally at all. Skip to 1.26 to see the computer in action. Just a minute or two of it.
At 1:45 "If you look inside a computer, you find an impressive assembly of basic mechanisms. Some of them are duplicated many times in one computer"
Or, you might mean, Fuzzy logic which is used a fair bit, but can be simulated adequately on an ordinary digital computer.
The thing that makes a quantum computer special is that it can explore qbits that can be in multiple states at once - entangled with other qbits.
In principle this could make it much faster at some problems, e.g. factorizing numbers. The results so far aren't that impressive, the record is 143, and then 56153, that last one used a special trick that only works for very few numbers. Shor's algorithm - New largest number factored on a quantum device is 56,153.
But in principle a quantum computer could hugely outperform any classical computer for this problem, factorizing a number in seconds that you might need entire lifetime of the universe and still not factorize by ordinary methods.